|Source:||All England Reporter|
|Publisher Citation:|| All ER (D) 60 (Mar)|
|Representation||Christopher Floyd QC and Michael Tappin (instructed by SJ Berwin & Co) for the first claimant.|
|Christopher Floyd QC and Adrian Speck (instructed by Taylor Joynson Garrett) for the second claimant.|
|Simon Thorley QC and Colin Birss (instructed by Simmons & Simmons) for the defendant.|
|Judgment Dates:||6 March 2002|
Patent - Revocation - Validity of patent - Obviousness - Defendant owning patent relating to form of oral administration of drug - Claimant seeking revocation of patent on grounds of obviousness - Whether patent invalid.