Nicholas Chapman#828

Nicholas Chapman

Nicholas Chapman's background is in business crime though he now principally acts in civil cases, often involving some criminal dimension. In recent years he has acted in many of the biggest, most complex and most high-profile civil tax fraud cases, frequently as leading junior. He also acts in matters involving substantial questions of pure tax and Community law. He continues occasionally to act in criminal cases involving the most serious allegations of commercial fraud and corruption. He also specialises in civil and quasi-criminal asset recovery and injunctive relief proceedings, principally in the commercial courts. He has particular expertise in cross-border cases; many of his cases have an international dimension and he frequently works with foreign lawyers and as part of multi-disciplinary teams. Nicholas also advises corporations and regulators in very substantial regulatory and compliance matters. His practice also has a substantial public law aspect, acting for a range of government and private clients across a wide spectrum of administrative, public and private law litigation. He has appeared in a large number of reported public law cases, often involving particularly challenging and significant legal or factual issues.

He is instructed with increasing frequency at appellate level and has acted at all levels up to the Supreme Court. His clients include the Government Legal Department, HMRC, the SFO, CPS Special Casework, the National Crime Agency, multinational corporations and Magic Circle and other leading firms of solicitors. Amongst other appointments, he is a member of the Treasury Panel of Counsel to the Crown.

Contributed to

1

Mutual legal assistance—civil recovery
Mutual legal assistance—civil recovery
Practice notes

This Practice Note explains the regime for mutual legal assistance (MLA) in civil recovery proceedings under Part 5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) and Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (External Requests and Orders) Order 2005, SI 2005/3181. It explains when civil recovery can take place to give effect to a foreign court order, the interim remedies which are available as well as the circumstances in which civil recovery proceedings can be used to give effect to an external request to prohibit dealing with property. The Practice Note also highlights the practical considerations which practitioners ought to bear in mind when dealing with such proceedings.

Practice Area

Panel

  • Contributing Author

Qualified Year

  • 2001

Membership

  • Fraud Lawyers Association
  • Constitutional and Administrative Law Bar Association
  • Association of Regulatory and Disciplinary Lawyers
  • Proceeds of Crime Lawyers Association

Education

  • Nottingham University and Universit de Versailles (LL.B. Law with European Law)

If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.