Christopher McFarland#2992

Christopher McFarland

Director, Sinclairs Law
Christopher is a Director within the Education and Public Law departments at Sinclairslaw. Starting with the firm as a trainee in 2013, Christopher has risen internally through the ranks to lead the Education Team in our Cardiff Office. He is the firm Legal Aid Supervisor for Education.

Professional Expertise:

Christopher specialises in all areas of Education and Public law. He has extensive experience with Special Educational Needs (SEN), Additional Learning Needs (ALN), Discrimination and Higher Education cases. Christopher has significant experience in pursuing complex judicial review cases at the High Court and was recently a key member of the firm’s team which brought landmark success in the case of R (Gardner) v Secretary of State for Health and ors [2022] EWHC 967 (Admin).

As the Legal Aid supervisor for Education, Christopher oversees all of the firm’s Legal Aid cases alongside a busy and diverse private practise.

Special Educational Needs (SEN):

Christopher has nearly a decade of experience in supporting children, young people, parents and families with their SEN cases. Whether it is a Tribunal appeal, an admission appeal or an exclusion; Christopher’s calm experience and detailed knowledge of the law of SEN will help you navigate the complex evidence and arguments of your case.

Additional Learning Needs (ALN):

In Wales, Christopher has been a part of key discussions surrounding the creation and implementation of the Additional Learning Needs and Education Tribunal (Wales) Act 2018. Since its implementation, he has guided parents and professionals in better understanding the new legislation and the new system for pupils with ALN in Wales.

Christopher also has extensive experience in supporting young people in Wales in appealing decisions surrounding their Learning and Skills Assessments or Plans (LSA or LSP).

Upper Tribunal:

Christopher also has experience in successfully appealing matters to the Upper Tribunal in circumstances where the First-Tier Tribunal has erred in law. His most recent success was in the case of AB v Newport CC [2022] UKUT 190 (AAC)

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/62e7c08bd3bf7f75b89e189c/UA-2021-001315-HSWc.pdf

Discrimination:

Christopher has extensive experience in bringing discrimination cases against schools, colleges and Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) where they have failed to adhere to their duties under the Equality Act 2010.

Notable cases:

MH: Christopher represented a medical student with Dyslexia who had not received appropriate adjustments to one of his examinations. A bright and able student, the student had been prejudiced in this particular examination and had been removed from his course following his mark. After Christopher successfully negotiated his return to the course with appropriate adjustments, the student proceeded to pass his degree with strong grades and is now a practising doctor.

XX: Christopher represented a family whose child had been given a fixed term exclusion for failing to wear a mask during the pandemic. The child had ADHD and struggled to cope with the sensory experience of wearing a mask in lessons. The school had failed to follow government guidance on mask wearing for disabled pupils and had failed to make reasonable adjustments for the child. After a claim was issued to the SEN Tribunal, Christopher was able to negotiate the child’s return with appropriate adjustments in place, together with an apology from the school and a change of schoolwide policy.

Higher Education:

Christopher has extensive experience in supporting clients with all elements of HEI and University cases, to include:

Student finance and fee queries;
Admission Appeals
Academic Appeals
Complaints

Fitness to Practise Cases:

Christopher receives a number of referrals from other firms in the UK and has experience in pursuing cases through internal University procedures, the Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA) and to the Civil or High Courts thereafter.

Judicial Review:

Christopher has a broad public law practise, taking forward a number of complex cases. Christopher has particular experience in pursuing novel or unusual cases and his cases have been featured in local and national media.

Notable cases:

R (Gardner) v DHSC [2022] EWHC 967 (Admin): Christopher was a senior member of the team which brought about this landmark judgment against the then Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (Matt Hancock) for implementing an unlawful policy regarding the discharge of patients to care homes during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. We represented two bereaved families of older men who had lost their lives from COVID-19 in a care home.

AC v OIA: Christopher led a case on behalf of a former medical student who sought to return to her course following a period of family difficulties. The OIA refused to hear her complaint due a misinterpretation of its duties under the Higher Education act 2004 https://www.oiahe.org.uk/media/1870/ac-hc-judgment.pdf

R (Lloyd) v Cardiff County Council: Christopher led a case for a client with electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EMH) who had seen his package of care removed without notice from the Council. The High Court ruled that the Council’s decision had been based on a flawed reading of inapplicable guidance and found in the Claimant’s favour.

Professional Regulation and Fitness to Practise:

Christopher has extensive experience representing students and professionals with regulatory and fitness to practise cases. Christopher has represented clients dealing with regulatory issues under the GMC, GDC, HCPC and BPTC. Christopher has represented clients before University Fitness to Practise panels and before the Health and Care Professions Tribunal Service (HCPTS).
Contributed to

11

Accidents in schools—liability in tort
Accidents in schools—liability in tort
Practice notes

This Practice Note mentions that children are often injured at school without any fault on the part of any person, and goes on to discuss case law illustrating the factors that may distinguish a successful claim against a school or its owners from an unsuccessful claim. These factors are a duty of care, vicarious liability, contributory negligence, foreseeable consequences, causation and proximity, the age, disposition and mental capacity of the child, the level of supervision expected in a school, and the extent to which the child was at the material time under the care or control of the school.

Children’s rights in schools
Children’s rights in schools
Practice notes

This Practice Note explains that the main rights of a child in school are the right to an education and the right to receive the level of care and protection which a reasonable parent would give, and that these rights are recognised in statute and common law respectively. It discusses relevant provisions in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989 and the Human Rights Act 1998, as well as a number of related issues including the right to change a child’s name, free school meals and the provision of uniform and other clothing, and summarises the case law on taking photographs of children at school.

Land transfers for new academy schools
Land transfers for new academy schools
Practice notes

This Practice Note outlines the basic funding arrangements of an academy school, highlighting who is responsible for the day-to-day running of the academy and the maintenance of the grounds and buildings. The need for a land transfer arises as an academy will often utilise premises that have been vacated by a previous state-funded school. It explains the process and the issues that arise during the transfer of land from a community school, a voluntary aided school, a voluntary combined school and a foundation school to an academy. This Practice Note applies only in England; there are no academies in Wales.

Legislative competence of devolved parliaments
Legislative competence of devolved parliaments
Practice notes

This Practice Note considers the competences of certain devolved Parliaments in the UK. The UK devolution statutes contain schedules setting out the extent of legislative competence of devolved parliaments, as well as matters that continue to be reserved to, or dealt with by the Westminster Parliament. This Practice Note includes a table outlining the level of competence for the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Parliament.

School admission appeals
School admission appeals
Practice notes

This Practice Note provides a summary of school admissions appeals covering the legislative framework in both England and Wales. It also covers the appeals process including the two stages and the infant class size process. It also covers who can sit on appeal panels, and how the appeal hearings are convened and conducted together with further remedies available if unsuccessful.

School attendance
School attendance
Practice notes

This Practice Note summarises what constitutes compulsory school age. It explains that under the Education Act 1996, a child of compulsory school age must either be registered at a school or be suitably educated otherwise than at school. It also covers school attendance orders; and that it is a criminal offence for a parent to fail to comply with a school attendance order. It notes that police officers and community support officers are authorised to carry out truancy sweeps.

School land and premises
School land and premises
Practice notes

This Practice Note explains that the ownership of school land and premises depends mainly on the type of school in question, and discusses ownership in relation to community schools, voluntary schools, foundation schools, academies and free schools. It discusses renewed interest in the School Sites Act 1841, under which landowners were encouraged to donate sites for local schools on the basis that, if a school ever closed, the land would revert back to the donor. It also discusses provision for schools to be used for community purposes such as elections.

School transport and out-of-school trips
School transport and out-of-school trips
Practice notes

This Practice Note explains that every English local authority must develop for approval a school travel scheme under the Education Act 1996, s 508E for children of compulsory school age, and that unless and until an approved school travel scheme has been implemented, the local authority must provide other travel arrangements for every eligible child. Each school travel scheme must include a policy on charging the parents (or their children) for home-to-school travel, although protected children must travel free of charge. It also discusses case law relating to school transport, and legislation on out-of-school trips.

Practice Areas

Panels

  • Consulting Editorial Board
  • Contributing Author

Qualifications

  • LL.M
  • LL.B

Education

  • Glasgow University
  • Aberystwyth University

If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.