The Medical Law Review is established as an authoritative source of reference for academics, lawyers, legal and medical practitioners, law students and anyone interested in health care and the law. Primarily the Medical Law Review presents articles of international interest which provide thorough analyses and comment on the wide range of topical issues that are fundamental to this area of law. In addition it carries two commentary sections. The first concentrates on UK law and includes case reports and legislation summaries followed by analytical
interpretation of the impact of new developments in medical law. The second section concentrates on recent medico-legal developments in the US, the Commonwealth and Europe. The Review also carries book reviews of relevant publications.

Footnotes, where present, are bi-directional. This journal, along with other available UK law journals, can be searched in the All UK Law Journals file.

Online ISSN: 1464-3790
Print ISSN: 0967-0742

SOURCE CURRENCY Volume 32, Issue 3, 1 July 2024 Med Law Rev (2024) 32 (3): 301 UPDATE INFORMATION Articles My Advocacy is Not About Me, My Advocacy is About Canadians': A Qualitative Study of how Caregivers and Patients Influence Regulation of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada Mediating disputes under the Mental Capacity Act 2005: relationships, participation, and best interests Money matters: a critique of 'informed financial consent' A health-conformant reading of the GDPR's right not to be subject to automated decision-making France's constitutional right to abortion: symbolism over substance The short-lived verdict in Le Page v Center for Reproductive Medicine: why 'personhood' matters in the regulation of assisted reproductive technologies Michael Holmes v Poeton Holdings Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 1377: a necessary clarification for a non 'de minimis' discussion in causation Books Received Reviews Book Reviews: Privacy and Medical Confidentiality in Healthcare: A Comparative Analysis Book Reviews: Consent for Medical Treatment of Trans Youth Exploitation, Ethics and Law. Violating the Ethos of the Doctor–Patient Relationship.