Bankruptcy and Personal Insolvency Reports

This content is unique to LexisNexis

Cases

The series brings together case-law from pure insolvency law cases and a wide range of subject areas including civil procedure, commercial, property and family law in so far as they impact on personal insolvency issues in practice

Ensures you are kept up to date with all the latest case-law whether in relation to the conflict between matrimonial proceedings and creditors’ rights (Kremen v Agrest, Arif v Anwar), statutory demands (Webster v Mackay, Jones v FSA, Darbyshire v Turpin), the definition of bankruptcy debts (Nortel), enforcement against the bankrupt’s property (Liggett, Mallon, Graham, Kurd), the remuneration and costs of the trustee in bankruptcy (Secondus v Atkinson, Kaliq), whether to accept an IVA proposal rather than make a bankruptcy order (McNally, Mirpuri), individual voluntary arrangements (Davis v Price, Golstein v Bishop, Smith-Evans v Smailes), annulments (Consolidated Finance Limited v Collins, Oraki, Salliss) the jurisdiction of the court under the EC Regulation (O’Donnell, Flannery, Becker) or the impact of bankruptcy on professionals (Dowland, Moseley)

Produced six times a year, the reports ensure that you always have access to the recent court decisions
Each report contains a full headnote and is judicially approved before publication to ensure an accurate record of the case and judgment

COPYRIGHT INFORMATION
Crown copyright material reproduced by permission of The National Archives. The contents of the judgment can be used under the Open Justice – Licence https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/open-justice-licence. Crown copyright material only partially represents the activities of the courts and tribunals.

Material derived from the European Institutions is © European Union, 1998-2024 and re-used under the terms of the Commission Decision 2011/833/EU. To the extent that the above licences do not apply, Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of His Majesty’s Stationery Office and the King’s Printer for Scotland, while Parliamentary copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of His Majesty’s Stationery Office.

While we take all care to ensure this work is accurate, the authors, editors and publishers will not be liable for any losses that any person or entity may suffer as a result of relying on its contents.

Any material which has been reproduced from the official website of the European Court of Human Rights is ECHR-CEDH copyright.

Contributors

Peter Walton  Editor
 Andrew Keay Editor
 Jonathan Middleton Editor
 Paul French Editor