*Nottingham City Council v LW and others

Family proceedings Orders in family proceedings. The Family Division considered the applicant local authority's application for an interim care order regarding LW, who had been born on 16 January 2016. The court criticised delays arising from the local authority's conduct and stressed the importance of making applications for public law proceedings in respect of new born babies timeously and especially, where the circumstances arguably required the removal of the child from its parent(s), within at most five days of the child's birth.

Mann v Mann

Divorce Financial provision. The Family Division ruled on a wife's application for general enforcement of a financial award (the order) made in her favour in 2005 and for a suspended order for the husband's committal to prison for his alleged failure to pay the amount awarded. The court ruled that the husband's breach of a subsequent mediation agreement had the result that that agreement fell away and his obligations under the order remained. The wife was awarded 624,886 plus interest, to be determined, up to a period of six years after the judgment debt. On the facts, the court declined to make an order for the husband's committal to prison.

Rapp v Sarre (formerly Rapp)

Divorce Ancillary relief. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed an appeal by a husband against an ancillary relief order. The judge had not erred in awarding the wife more than 50% of the assets of the marriage, in circumstances where the husband had not made proper financial disclosure or provided a budget of his needs, and where the judge had made provision for the wife's trimmed budget whilst also providing properly for the husband's needs.

*Re B (A Child) (Habitual Residence: Inherent Jurisdiction)

Family proceedings Jurisdiction. The Supreme Court, in allowing the appellant's appeal, held in a case determining whether the court had jurisdiction based on habitual residence of a child, that the modern concept of a child's habitual residence operated in the expectation that when a child had a new habitual residence, he lost his old one. Only a degree of integration was required in the new state. It was highly unlikely that a child would be left in limbo without a habitual residence.

Re AZ (Child) (Relocation to Poland)

Family proceedings Orders in family proceedings. The Family Court allowed the mother's application to relocate with her child back to Poland to live with the family on the basis that the state of the mother's mental health meant that it was in the child's best interest for the mother to have the support of her family in Poland.

Re M (Children) (Care proceedings: failure to consider possibility of return)

Family proceedings Orders in family proceedings. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed an appeal against a care order made in respect of an adopted boy. The judge had failed adequately to analyse the evidence or explain his reasons for reaching the conclusion that he had. There had been a number of issues that could have resulted in findings of fact which, had the judge made them, could have been considered in determining whether the boy could have returned to live with his parents.

Q v Q (No 3)

Family proceedings Orders in family proceedings. The Family Division refused the application by the father, a convicted sex offender for contact with his son as no method of managing the kind of dangers that a convicted sex offender like the father might pose even to his own son had been put before the court. The mother's application for an order under of the Children Act 1989 would be refused as the present case was not one involving repeated applications. Nor had it displayed on the part of the father the kind of behaviour which, typically, founded a successful application for such an order.

Re C (a child); (refusal to make interim care order)

Family proceedings Orders in family proceedings. The Family Court declined to make an interim care order in respect of a child C who had been living with the maternal grandmother and in contact with her mother despite the fact that the mother had serious drug addiction issues. Although the criteria for making an interim care order under the of the Children Act 1989 was satisfied however in the exercise of the court's discretion C's welfare demanded that C nevertheless be left in the care of the maternal grandmother.

Re C (A child)

Family proceedings Orders in family proceedings. The Family Court held that it was in the best interests of an eleven-year-old child, C, to remain in the care of his maternal aunt. It accordingly made a child arrangements order in favour of the aunt, which provided that C would live with her, and which would also confer on the aunt parental responsibility in respect of C for the duration of the order.

Rosa v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Immigration European Economic Area nationals. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed an appeal against a finding of the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (FTT) that the appellant Brazilian national had entered into a marriage of convenience with a Portuguese national in order to re-enter and remain in the United Kingdom. While the legal burden of proof lay on the Secretary of State throughout, the evidential burden could shift. The errors in law made by the FTT had not been material to the outcome.