||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 123 (Jan)
|| EWHC 54 (TCC)
||Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
||David Pliener (instructed by BLM) for CHT.
||CCL did not appear and was not represented.
||Gary Blaker QC (instructed by W Legal Ltd) for ENP.
||18 January 2018
Practice - Striking out - Pleading
Practice Striking out. The second defendant (ENP) successfully applied for summary judgment on its defence, in a claim concerning leaks caused by air conditioning systems. The Technology and Construction Court held that the case against ENP, which came down to alleged deficiencies in a manual it had provided, was fanciful, and had no realistic prospect of success.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases