||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 31 (Jul)
|| EWHC 1689 (QB)
||Queen's Bench Division
||Richard Munden (instructed by Brett Wilson LLP) for the G.
||David Hirst (instructed under the Direct Access Scheme) for S.
||6 July 2017
Libel and slander - Defamatory words - Words capable of defamatory meaning
Libel and slander Defamatory words. The claimant was entitled to damages for libel and harassment by the defendant in publishing a website and sending a person to his home. However, the Queen's Bench Division, held that neither party was entitled to damages for breaches of the by the other, as the judgment provided a sufficient record of the inaccuracies and there was no evidence of distress.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases