||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 47 (Dec)
|| EWHC 3113 (QB)
||Queen's Bench Division
||Jonathan Barnes and Victoria Jolliffe (instructed by JMW Solicitors) for the claimants.
||Anya Pope QC and Rupert Paines (instructed by DWF LLP) for Morrisons.
||1 December 2017
Vicarious liability - Employer and employee - Act of a class servant authorised to do
Vicarious liability Employer and employee. The employer, supermarket chain, Morrisons, was held to be vicariously liable for the criminal actions of a rogue employee in disclosing personal information of co-employees on the internet. The Queen's Bench Division held that there had been sufficient connection between the position in which the rogue employee had been employed and his wrongful conduct to make it right for Morrisons to be held liable under the principle of social justice. That conclusion would be the same irrespective of whether a breach of duty under the a misuse of private information, or a breach of the duty of confidence was concerned, for the essential actions constituting a legal wrong in each case had been the same.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases