||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 86 (Aug)
|| UKUT 328 (TCC)
||UK Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
Lord Ericht (sitting as a Judge of the Upper Tribunal)
||Roderick Cordara QC and Mitchell Moss (instructed by Ernst & Young) for the taxpayer.
||Peter Mantle (instructed by the Solicitor to the Revenue and Customs Commissioners) for the Revenue.
||14 August 2017
Value added tax - Taxable amount - Bingo session fees
Value added tax Taxable amount. The recalculation of the value of the participation fees paid by the taxpayer bingo operator's customers on a session-by-session basis rather than game-by-game basis, as stated by the Revenue and Customs Commissioners to be the correct approach, resulted in a 'decrease in consideration for a supply, which included an amount of VAT', which had occurred after the end of the prescribed accounting period in which the original supply had taken place' within the meaning of reg 38 of the Value Added Tax Regulations 1995, . The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) so held in upholding the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) and thereby dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases