||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 20 (Aug)
|| UKSC 58
Lord Neuberger P, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge SCJJ
||Henry Blaxland QC and Edward Henry (instructed by Stokoe Partnership Solicitors) for M.
||Michael Bromley Martin QC and Simon Baker (instructed by Stokoe Partnership Solicitors) for C and T.
||Julian Christopher QC, Brian Nicholson and Joel Smith (instructed by CPS Specialist Fraud Division) for the Crown.
||3 August 2017
Trade mark - Unauthorised use of registered trade mark - Criminal offence
Trade mark Unauthorised use of registered trade mark. On the true construction of s92(1) of the signs (or trade marks) which had been applied to goods for which there had originally been an authorisation of manufacture by the registered trade mark holder, but whose sale had not been authorised by him, fell squarely within the description in s92(1)(b) of the Act. Accordingly, the Supreme Court dismissed the appellants' appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, that the appellants had been properly indicted for, among other things, offences of unauthorised use of trade marks, contrary to s92(1)(b) and (c) of that Act.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases