||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 46 (Sep)
|| UKUT 369 (IAC)
||UK Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
||Billal Malik (instructed by Londonium Chamber Ltd) for the first claimant.
|| Abdurahman Jafar (instructed under the Direct Access Scheme) for the second claimant.
||Alan Payne (instructed by the Government Legal Department) for the Secretary of State.
||17 August 2017
Immigration - Leave to remain - Tier 2 (General) migrant
Immigration Leave to remain. It had not been unlawful for the defendant Secretary of State not to afford a 60 day period to the claimants in order to seek to obtain further Tier 2 employment following the revocation of their sponsors' licences. The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) held that the Secretary of State's decision was rational, as there were material distinctions which she was justified in drawing between Tier 4 and Tier 2.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases