||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 205 (Mar)
|| EWCA Civ 180
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Longmore, Christopher Clarke and King LJJ
||Craig Orr QC and Mehdi Baiou (instructed by Pitmans LLP) for One Step.
||Stephen Knafler QC and Charles Béar QC (instructed by Neves Solicitors LLP) for the defendants.
||22 March 2016
Restraint of trade by agreement - Employer and employee - Breach - Defendants entering into deeds with claimant company - Deeds containing, among other things, certain non-compete and non-solicitation covenants - Claimant alleging breach of covenants - Among other things, judge finding defendants breaching non-compete and non-solicitation covenants - Judge finding it being just for claimant to have option of recovering damages in amount which might reasonably be demanded for releasing defendants from covenants - Whether judge erring.
Restraint of trade by agreement Employer and employee. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the defendants' appeal in respect of the judge's findings of breaches of non-compete and non-solicitation covenants in the sale of a business providing 'supported living' services for children leaving care and vulnerable adults. Further, it upheld the judge's conclusion that an award of damages on the Wrotham Park basis (see Wrotham Park Estate Co Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd[) was the just response in the present case.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases