Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2016] All ER (D) 52 (Jul)
Neutral Citation: [2016] EWCA Civ 705
Court: Court of Appeal, Civil Division

Elias, King LJJ and Sir Stephen Richards

Representation Paul Skinner (instructed by ATM Law Solicitors) for MA.
  Manjit Gill QC and Ripon Akther (instructed by Malik & Malik) for the second appellant.
  Stephen Knafler QC and Charlotte Bayati (instructed by Polpitiya & Co) for NS, AR and CW.
  Frances Shaw (instructed by Adam Bernard Solicitors) for the sixth appellant.
  The first respondent did not appear and was not represented.
  Lisa Giovannetti QC and Andrew Byass (instructed by Government Legal Department) for the Secretary of State for the Home Department.
Judgment Dates: 7 July 2016


Immigration - Indefinite leave to remain - Children - Removal of children following United Kingdom residence for seven years - Test of reasonableness - Application of test of reasonableness - Immigration Rules, r 276ADE(1)(iv) - .

The Case

Immigration Indefinite leave to remain. The Court of Appeal heard six cases together raising a common issue of the correct test of reasonableness which should be applied when determining whether or not it was reasonable to remove a child from the United Kingdom once he or she had been resident there for seven years.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.