Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2015] All ER (D) 83 (Sep)
Court: Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber)
Judge:

Judges Ilešic (President of the Chamber), Ó Caoimh (Rapporteur), Toader, Jarašiunas and Fernlund

Judgment Dates: 10 September 2015

Catchwords

European Union - Dumping - Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of ceramic tiles originating in China - Proceedings concerning collection by respondent of anti-dumping duty - Applicant objecting to notice served concerning duty - National court staying proceedings and referring question to Court of Justice of the European Union for preliminary ruling - Whether regulation imposing definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting being valid - Whether selection of United States as appropriate market economy third country in order to calculate 'normal value' of relevant products being affected by importation at issue in main proceedings infringing relevant regulation - Council Implementing - , art 2(7)(a).

The Case

European Union Dumping. The Court of Justice of the European Union, in considering a question referred for a preliminary ruling, concerning the validity of the Council Implementing , which imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ceramic tiles originating in China, ruled that the question had disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of that Regulation.

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.