||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 08 (Dec)
|| UKUT 662 (IAC)
||Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
||Danny Bazini (instructed by David Tang & Co) for the first claimant.
|| Ramby de Mello (instructed by David Tang & Co) for the second to fifth claimants.
|| Julie Anderson (instructed by the Government Legal Department) for the Secretary of State.
||23 November 2015
Immigration - Leave to remain - Grant based on false information - Defendant Secretary of State refusing to transfer 'no time limit' stamp from claimants' immigration status documents to their passports and to issue biometric residence permit as grant of indefinite leave to remain (ILR) being based on false information - Claimants seeking judicial review - Whether Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) having jurisdiction to determine claim - Immigration (Biometric Registration) Regulations 2008, .
Immigration Leave to remain. The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) held that it had jurisdiction to determine a challenge to the refusal to transfer a 'no time limit' (NTL) stamp from the document given on grant of indefinite leave to remain (ILR) on the basis of false information.Where NTL was applied for following incorrect information which led to ILR, the Secretary of State should notify the claimant of the need to show cause why ILR should not be revoked.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases