||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 115 (Jun)
|| EWHC 1518 (Ch)
||Chancery Division, Companies Court
Mr Malcolm Davis-White QC (Sitting as a Deputy Judge of the Chancery Division)
|| Nigel Dougherty (instructed by Labrums LLP) for C.
||Paul Burton (instructed by Machins LLP) for B and G.
||The company was not represented and did not appear.
||28 May 2015
Company - Petition - Purchase of shares - Petitioner, C, presenting petition - First two respondent (the respondents) removing petitioner, C, as director and employee of third respondent company (the company) and not offering to buy his shares - Respondents to purchase C's one third shareholding in third respondent company - Whether conduct unfairly prejudicial to C's interests - Whether court should grant relief - .
Company Petition. The petitioner, C, presented a petition seeking an order that the first two respondents, B and G, purchase his one third shareholding in the third respondent company. The Companies Court held that, on the evidence, the first and second respondent directors of the company were subject to equitable constraints, and that none of the allegations made about C's conduct had justified his exclusion while leaving him locked into the company. Relief would be granted to C under of the Companies Act 2006.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases