||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 23 (May)
|| EWHC 1237 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London)
Mr Justice Mostyn
||Colin Banham (instructed by Absolute Barrister) for the appellant.
||James McClelland (instructed by Blake Morgan LLP) for the respondent.
||5 May 2015
Solicitor - Disciplinary proceedings - Appeal - Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal finding allegations against appellant being proved, and ordering suspension and payment of £4,000 costs - Appellant appealing against sanction - Whether sanction manifestly excessive and disproportionate.
Solicitor Disciplinary proceedings. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (the SDT) found allegations against the appellant proved, and ordered the appellant to be suspended for two years and to pay 4,000 in costs. The appellant appealed against the sanction. The Administrative Court, in allowing the appeal, held that a suspension for two years would only be appropriate where the facts had been close to warranting an order striking the solicitor off. In the present case, the period of suspension had been much too long and the appropriate period of suspension was one year. However, a one-year condition would be attached to the appellant's practising certificate.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases