||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 24 (Apr)
|| EWHC 936 (Ch)
||Patrick Green QC and Thomas Evans (instructed by Maitland Walker LLP) for the claimant.
||Jonathan Russen QC (instructed by Penningtons Manches LLP) for the defendants.
||1 April 2015
Practice - Summary judgment - Entitlement to summary judgment - Claimant commencing proceedings in tort and contract, alleging his shares in company being undervalued as result of conspiracy by defendants - Defendants successfully applying to strike out claim - claimant appealing - Whether chief master had erred in finding that claimant's statement of case did not disclosing reasonable ground for bringing claim - Whether appropriate to dispose of claimant's claim in deceit summarily - CPR 24.2.
Practice Summary judgment. The claimant commenced proceedings in tort and contract, alleging that his shares in a company had been undervalued as a result of a conspiracy by the defendants. The defendants successfully applied to strike out the claim, and the claimant appealed. The Chancery Division held that the Chief Master had erred in finding that the claimant's statement of case did not disclose a reasonable ground for bringing the claim, and that it had not been appropriate to dispose of the claimant's claim in deceit summarily.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases