||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 150 (Mar)
|| EWHC 722 (Ch)
Richard Spearman QC (Sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge)
||Simon Davenport QC and Richard Samuel (instructed by Isadore Goldman Ltd, Norwich) for the claimants.
||Jonathan Lopian (instructed by Hansells) for the defendants.
||14 March 2014
Practice - Civil litigation - Case management - Defendant seeking extension of time or relief from sanctions concerning service of witness statements and disclosure by list - Defendant seeking permission to re-amend amended defence - Claimants seeking declaration defendants breaching court's orders and striking out of amended defence - Whether parties' applications should be granted - CPR 32.10.
Practice Civil litigation. The defendants sought an extension of time or relief from sanctions with respect to service of witness statements and disclosure by list, and permission to re-amend the amended defence by adding pleas. The claimants sought an order striking out the amended defence. The Chancery Division dismissed the defendants' applications, but held that it would be a disproportionate response to all the defendants' defaults to strike out a pleaded case that had been placed on the record before any of the recent failures to comply with court orders and the CPR had occurred.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases