||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 69 (Feb)
||Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
Judge Greg Sinfield
||10 January 2014
Tribunal - Upper Tribunal - Procedure - Taxpayer companies successfully appealing against decision by Revenue and Customs Commissioners to refuse taxpayers deduction of input tax - Revenue appealing to Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) out of time - Whether extension of time should be granted to Revenue - Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, - CPR 3.9.
Tribunal Upper Tribunal. The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (the tribunal) dismissed the application by the Revenue and Customs Commissioners (the Revenue) for an extension of time for the filing of a notice of appeal. The tribunal decided that the two requirements specifically mentioned in the new CPR 3.9, namely the need for appeals to be conducted efficiently and the need to enforce compliance with the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, , led ineluctably to the conclusion that the Revenue's application to submit a notice of appeal after the time limit had expired should be refused.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases