||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 140 (Jan)
|| EWHC 51 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court
Judge Mackie QC
||James Maurici QC (instructed by Dechert LLP) for the claimant.
||Stephen Hockman QC and Megan Thomas (instructed by Maidstone Borough Council) for the authority.
||22 January 2014
Town and country planning - Permission for development - Environmental impact assessment - Retrospective planning permission - Whether defendant local authority unlawfully failing to consider whether there were exceptional circumstances justifying the grant of retrospective permission for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) development - Whether authority unlawfully failing to have regard to groundwater flooding within EIA process.
Town and country planning Permission for development. The Administrative Court allowed the claimant's application for judicial review of the defendant local authority's decision to grant retrospective planning permission for the extension of a fish farm to form an area of recreational fishing. The authority had unlawfully failed to consider whether there were exceptional circumstances justifying the grant of retrospective permission for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) development. Further, the authority had unlawfully failed to have regard to an issue of groundwater flooding within the EIA process.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases