|| All ER (D) 03 (Feb)
|| EWHC 142 (Comm)
||Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court
||David Wolfson QC and Adam Rushworth (instructed by Watson Farley & Williams) for the claimant.
||Sonia Tolaney QC and Tom de Vecchi (instructed by Simmons & Simmons LLP) for the defendant.
||31 January 2014
Swap agreement - Interest rate swap agreement - Validity - Defendant entering two interest rate swaps with Italian local authority - Claimant subsequently entering third swap with authority - Italian court finding third swap impermissible derivative transaction - Claimant issuing proceedings against defendant on basis second swap void - Whether second swap being void.
Swap agreement Interest rate swap agreement. The defendant entered two interest rate swaps with an Italian local authority. The claimant entered a third swap with the authority, which the Italian Court of Auditors of the Regional Chamber of Control for Campania found to be an impermissible derivative transaction under a decree. The claimant issued proceedings against the defendant on the basis that the second swap had been void. The Commercial Court, in dismissing the claim, held that the claimant had failed to show that: (i) the decree did not permit restructuring of principal; (ii) the second swap had resulted in an increasing profile; and (iii) there was a premium.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases