||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 71 (Aug)
|| EWHC 2831 (QB)
||Queen's Bench Division
Mr Justice Bean
||Hugh Tomlinson QC (instructed by Wragge Lawrence Graham) for the claimants.
||David Price QC (of David Price Solicitors and Advocates) for the defendants.
||13 August 2014
Libel and slander - Defamation - Serious harm - Claimants being private landlord - Defendant publishing article in which it was alleged by claimants they were portrayed as 'slum landlords' - Claimants bringing action against defendants in defamation - Whether words capable of bearing meaning claimed by claimant - Whether serious harm being caused to reputation - .
Libel and slander Defamation. The first claimant was the CEO of the second claimant, a private landlord company. A newspaper article was published by the defendants in which it was alleged by the claimants had portrayed them as 'slum landlords'. The claimants brought a claim in defamation against the defendants as a result of the article. Following a trial of two preliminary issues, the Queen's Bench division held that the words complained of had the meaning that the claimants were a well-off landlord making money at the misery of the tenants. The claimants had nevertheless failed to demonstrated serious harm to reputations as required by of the Defamation Act 2013.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases