||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 266 (Feb)
||Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
Judge Colin Bishopp, Mr Keith Palmer and Mr Ian Abrams
||Dr Michael von Pommern-Peglow (instructed by Ford & Warren) for the applicant.
||Timothy Otty QC and Simon Pritchard (instructed by the Financial Services Authority) for the FSA.
||23 January 2013
Financial services - Financial Services Authority (FSA) - Regulation of financial services - Market abuse - FSA issuing decision notice to applicant company conveying conclusion that applicant had committed market abuse - FSA imposing substantial penalty on applicant - Applicant referring decision notice to Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) - Whether tribunal having jurisdiction to hear matter - Whether allegations of market abuse justified - Whether penalty appropriate - .
Financial services Financial Services Authority (FSA). The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (the tribunal) directed that the penalty of 8m imposed by the Financial Services Authority on a company, 7722656 Canada Inc (formerly trading as Swift Trade Inc) should remain, in circumstances where the tribunal had found that the allegations of market abuse in breach of of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 made against that company had been made out.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases