||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 167 (Apr)
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Pitchford LJ, Roderick Evans and Turner JJ (judgment delivered extempore)
||Dingle Clark (instructed by Wilkin Chapman LLP, Lincoln) for the defendant.
||Brigadier Neil Jones (instructed by the Service Prosecuting Authority) for the Crown.
||19 April 2013
Sentence - Imprisonment - Appeal against sentence - Defendant and victim both working as officers for the Royal Airforce - Defendant being found guilty of committing assault by penetration against victim - Defendant being sentenced to two years' imprisonment - Defendant appealing - Whether sentence manifestly excessive.
Sentence Imprisonment. The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division dismissed a defendant's appeal against a sentence of two years' imprisonment following a conviction of assault by penetration where the offence had been committed by the defendant against the victim, both of whom had been officers for the Royal Air Force. The defendant's submissions that the sentence had been manifestly excessive were rejected as having no merit.
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases