||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 58 (Nov)
|| EWHC 2978 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London)
||Sam Jones (instructed by Rodney King & Partners) for the appellant.
||James Boyd (instructed by the Appeals Unit - Crown Prosecution Service) for the respondent.
||11 October 2012
Animal - Dog - Dangerous dog - Appellant walking her two dogs - One of the dog biting another dog in public - Appellant being charged with offences relating to dangerous dogs - Crown Court upholding decision to impose destruction order on appellant's dogs - Appellant appealing - Whether court erring - .
Animal Dog. The appellant dog owner had appealed against a destruction order which had been upheld by a Crown Court following an incident where the appellant had lost control of one of her dogs in a public place and that dog had subsequently bitten another dog. The Administrative Court, in allowing the appeal, held that the approach which had been taken by the Court in deciding whether to uphold the destruction order had been incorrect.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases