||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 268 (Oct)
||Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court
Moses LJ and Simon J (judgment delivered extempore)
||James Hasslacher (instructed by GT Stewart) for the appellant.
||Paul Lodato (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the respondent.
||26 October 2012
Criminal evidence - Identity - Accused - Information from CRIMINT records being admitted as identification evidence against appellant - Appellant appealing by case stated - Whether evidence admissible - .
Criminal evidence Identity. The Divisional Court dismissed the appellant's appeal by case stated against the magistrates' decision to admit information from the CRIMINT as evidence as it could reasonably have been supposed that the information in the CRIMINT had come from a person with personal knowledge of the information supplied.
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases