Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2012] All ER (D) 268 (Oct)
Court: Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court

Moses LJ and Simon J (judgment delivered extempore)

Representation James Hasslacher (instructed by GT Stewart) for the appellant.
  Paul Lodato (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the respondent.
Judgment Dates: 26 October 2012


Criminal evidence - Identity - Accused - Information from CRIMINT records being admitted as identification evidence against appellant - Appellant appealing by case stated - Whether evidence admissible - .

The Case

Criminal evidence Identity. The Divisional Court dismissed the appellant's appeal by case stated against the magistrates' decision to admit information from the CRIMINT as evidence as it could reasonably have been supposed that the information in the CRIMINT had come from a person with personal knowledge of the information supplied.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.