||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 237 (Oct)
|| EWCA Civ 1372
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Arden, Sullivan and Patten LJJ
||Brian McGurk (Company Director) for the appellant.
||Ellie Cameron-Daum (Company Secretary) for the respondent.
||23 October 2012
Property - Commonhold and leasehold property - Right to manage - Self-contained building - Respondent company seeking right to manage (RTM) blocks of flats - Upper tribunal (UT) upholding decision of leasehold valuation tribunal that certain appurtenances did not need to appertain to flats exclusively - Appellant appealing - Whether UT erring - Leasehold Reform Act 2002, ss 71-72 and 112.
Property Commonhold and leasehold property. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in dismissing the appellant's appeal, held, inter alia, that appurtenances belonging to or enjoyed by two blocks of flats would still be considered appurtenances for the purposes of ss71 and 71 of the despite also being enjoyed by occupiers of other properties which were not the subject of a right to manage claim.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases