||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 351 (Oct)
||Employment Appeal Tribunal
||The employee appeared in person.
||Caroline Musgrave (instructed by Kennedys Solicitors) for the employer.
||3 October 2012
Employment - Victimisation - Protected disclosure - Detriment - Employee making protected disclosure - Employee becoming ill - Employee not returning to work - Employee resigning - Employment judge finding employee's claim that suffering detriment by reason of making public-interest disclosure within time - Judge refusing to strike out part of employee's claim - Whether tribunal erring - .
Employment Victimisation. The Employment Appeal Tribunal found that the employment tribunal had erred in failing to identify what was the act, or deliberate failure to act, causative of detriment. However, it found that the employment tribunal had been correct in finding that the employee's claim for holiday pay should not be struck out.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases