Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2012] All ER (D) 168 (Oct)
Neutral Citation: [2012] EWHC 2775 (Ch)
Court: Chancery Division
Judge:

Mr Kevin Prosser QC (Sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court)

Representation Tim Penny and Philip Hinks (instructed by the FSA) for the claimant.
  Philip Coppel QC and Vivienne Tanchel (instructed by Aegis Tax LLP) for the third and fifth defendants.
  The other defendants did not appear and were not represented.
Judgment Dates: 16 October 2012

Catchwords

Practice - Preliminary point of law - Matters appropriate to be considered as preliminary issues - Instant proceedings arising out of proceedings brought by claimant Financial Services Authority against defendants for various alleged breaches of legislative provision - Question arising as to meaning of 'day-to-day control' arising in course of proceedings - Whether appropriate for question to be considered as preliminary question - .

The Case

Practice Preliminary point of law. In the course of proceedings against a number of defendants by the Financial Services Authority, a preliminary question arose as to the meaning of 'day-to-day control' within of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. The court held that the various factors in the case pointed in favour of answering the question in the course of a full trial, and so ruled that it would not answer the question on a preliminary basis.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.