||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 120 (Nov)
|| EWHC 2918 (Ch)
||Romie Tager QC and Nicholas Trompeter (instructed by McFaddens LLP) for the claimants.
||Mark Wonnacott (instructed by Mishcon de Reya) for the defendants.
||22 October 2012
Practice - Summary judgment - Entitlement to summary judgment - Claimants' land bounded by defendants' land - Defendants proposing redevelopment - Claimants considering redevelopment infringing proprietary rights under deed clause - Claimants seeking declaration of infringement - Claimants seeking summary judgment - Whether declaration serving useful purpose - Whether case being suitable for summary judgment - Whether summary judgment should be granted.
Practice Summary judgment. The owners of a property commenced proceedings for a declaration that certain companies' which had acquired the reversion on the owners' lease proposed redevelopment of their property would infringe the owners' property rights. The owners sought summary judgment. The Chancery Division held that the companies' proposal would constitute trespass and it would be right to grant the declaration sought.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases