||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 316 (Oct)
|| EWCA Civ 1379
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Ward, Richards and Patten LJJ
||James Eadie QC and Katherine Olley (instructed by Child Maintenance Litigation and Advice Team) for the Commission.
||Richard Gordon QC and Matthew Stockwell (instructed by Forshaws Davies Ridgway LLP) for the defendants.
||30 October 2012
Child - Maintenance - Child support - Non-resident parent - Absent parents failing to make child support payments - Claimant Commission obtaining warrants for committal - Parents appealing - Whether threshold pre-requisites routinely observed by Commission - Whether court failing to consider driving disqualification as alternative sanction - Whether procedures and practices compliant with right to fair trial - European Convention on Human Rights, art 6.
Child Maintenance. The defendants had been committed to a term of imprisonment for non-payment of child support. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed both of their appeals. In the first case, the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission had not followed the correct steps. In the second case, the court had failed to consider disqualification from driving as an alternative. The court criticised of the form of summons used by the Commission and its approach to the burden of proof which lay upon it.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases