||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 339 (Oct)
|| EWCA Civ 1400
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Mummery, Hughes LJJ and Bean J
||Oliver Segal QC (instructed by Morgan Cole LLP) for the claimant.
||Fergus Randolph QC and Max Schaefer (instructed by Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP) for the defendant.
||30 October 2012
Agent - Commercial agent - Termination of agency - Claimant being appointed agent for distribution of defendant's products - Employee of claimant posting 'joke' article on website - Defendant considering posting amounting to fundamental breach of contract justifying termination - Claimant seeking compensation for wrongful termination of agency contract - Judge finding posting amounting to breach insufficient to justify immediate termination - Defendant appealing - Whether judge erring - Commercial Agents Regulations 1993, , .
Agent Commercial agent. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, held that when considering a breach of an agency contract for the purposes of determining whether such a breach had amounted to a right to immediate termination, the question was whether the breach went to the root of the agency relationship. A breach of reg3 of the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993, SI1993-3053 had not given rise to an automatic right to terminate.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases