||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 74 (Oct)
|| EWHC 2644 (TCC)
||Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court
||Justin Mort (instructed by Fenwick Elliott LLP) for the claimant.
||Simon Hughes QC (instructed by DAC Beachcroft LLP) for the defendant.
||8 October 2012
Building contract - Construction - Sub-contract - Claimant engaging defendant sub-contractor for construction project - Defendant failing to perform - Claimant taking possession of defendant's equipment under sub-contract clause - Claimant seeking declarations equipment deemed claimant's property and defendant not entitled to remove - Whether title and ownership of equipment passing to and remaining with claimant.
Building contract Construction. The contractor sought declarations that it owned the sub-contractor's equipment under a clause of the sub-contract. The Technology and Construction Court held that permanent ownership of the equipment was not intended to pass to the contractor but that it had possessory rights over it until the work was completed. Accordingly, the court made the declarations.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases