||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 259 (Jul)
|| EWHC 2044 (Comm)
||Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court
||Jasbir Dhillon and Craig Morrison (instructed by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan UK LLP) for the claimant.
||Adrian Beltrami QC and Richard Hanke (instructed by Linklaters LLP) for the defendant.
||8 July 2012
Contract - Implied term - Implication necessary to give business efficacy to contract - Parties entering contract - Claimant contending contract containing term sheet and implied terms - Whether term sheet forming part of contract - Construction of contract - Whether contract containing implied terms - Whether defendant breaching contract.
Contract Implied term. The Commercial Court held that the defendant company was not in breach of its contract with the claimant company as the terms alleged by the claimant could not be implied into the contract.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases