||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 156 (Dec)
|| EWHC 3640 (Ch)
||Michael Furness QC (instructed by Squire Sanders (UK) LLP) for the claimant.
||Jonathan Evans and Emily McKechnie (instructed by Linklaters LLP) for the first defendant.
||Fenner Moeran and Jennifer Seaman (instructed by Eversheds LLP) for the second defendant.
||17 December 2012
Pension - Pension scheme - Surplus fund - Court previously holding previous trustee of pension scheme having duty to consider adding share of surplus in respect of deferred member's pension when member leaving service - Claimant trustee seeking determination on outstanding issues - Whether previous trustee having performed duty - Whether specified members receiving benefits.
Pension Pension scheme. The Chancery Division previously gave judgment finding that the previous trustee of a pension scheme had had a duty to consider adding a share of surplus in respect of a deferred member's pension at the date when the member left service. The trustee of the scheme sought the court's determination on outstanding issues. The court held that the previous trustee had complied with that duty for most of the relevant period and ruled on the date on which a new policy had been implemented.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases