||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 106 (Aug)
|| EWHC 2257 (TCC)
||Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court
||Daniel Crowley (instructed by Plexus Law) for the claimant.
||Muhammed Haque (instructed by Clyde & Co LLP) for the authority.
||16 August 2012
Negligence - Causation - Predominant cause - Claimant's house sustaining subsidence damage - Claimant bringing claim against defendant local authority alleging damage caused by authority's trees - Whether authority's trees predominant cause of damage - Whether damage reasonable foreseeable - Whether authority negligent.
Negligence Causation. The Technology and Construction Court held that the defendant local authority had negligently failed to prune a number of large poplar trees which had caused subsidence damage to the claimant's house.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases