||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 141 (Jan)
|| EWHC 2691 (Ch)
||Peter Shaw and Joseph Curl (instructed by CJ Jones Solicitors) for the claimant.
||Duncan Macpherson (instructed via Public Access) for the defendant.
||23 August 2012
Practice - Pre-trial or post-judgment relief - Freezing order - Court having given judgment against defendant, BV - Court finding BV having given dishonest evidence and having attempted to remove and conceal assets from liquidator - BV not having sufficient assets in jurisdiction to meet debt - Liquidator seeking freezing order - Whether real risk of dissipation by BV - Whether order to be granted on worldwide basis - Whether order to be extended to cover assets held by BV as trustee - Whether order to be time-limited.
Practice Pre-trial or post-judgment relief. Following judgment being given against the defendant, the Chancery Division considered an application by the claimant liquidator for a freezing order against the defendant. The court held that, although the order was wider than usual, it would be granted largely as sought.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases