||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 139 (Sep)
|| EWCA Crim 1870
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Gross LJ, Griffith Williams and Sweeney JJ
||A Edie (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for L.
||P Arnold (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for S.
||2 August 2012
Sentence - Imprisonment - Length of sentence - Defendants being convicted of conspiracy to commit robbery - Over £108,000 being stolen in raid on bank - Defendants being sentenced to 12 years and 9 years' imprisonment respectively - Whether sentences manifestly excessive.
Sentence Imprisonment. The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, held that two sentences imposed for conspiracy to commit robbery had not been manifestly excessive, in circumstances where the offenders had taken part in a well-planned robbery of a bank in which over 108,000 had been stolen.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases