||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 216 (Oct)
|| EWHC 2686 (Comm)
||Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court
||Sara Masters (instructed by Ince & Co LLP) for the claimant.
||Robert Bright QC (instructed by Reed Smith LLP) for the club.
||21 October 2011
Arbitration - Award - Appeal - Challenge to award on ground of serious irregularity - Claimant being member of defendant club - Defendant agreeing to cover claimant for settlement sums paid to third party on claimant's behalf - Defendant subsequently deciding cover not available to claimant - Defendant commencing arbitration for recovery of sums paid to third party - Arbitrators making award in defendant's favour - Whether arbitrators erring - Whether material irregularity existing - ss 68, 69.
Arbitration Award. The Commercial Court, Queen's Bench Division, dismissed: (i) the claimant company's appeal, pursuant to of the Arbitration Act 1996, against an arbitration award made in the defendant club's favour: and (ii) the claimant's application to set aside that award pursuant to s 68 of that Act. The court took the view that there had been no errors of law or serious irregularity.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases