||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 71 (Jan)
|| EWCA Civ 1
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Maurice Kay, Elias and Pitchford LJJ
||Jonathan Crow QC and Amy Rogers (instructed by Stephenson Harwood) for the claimant.
||Jonathan Swift QC and Robert Wastell (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendant.
||Martin Chamberlain and Melanie Plimmer (instructed by the Special Advocates Support Office) for the Special Advocates.
||13 January 2011
Terrorism - Prevention of terrorism - Financial restrictions - Defendant HM Treasury making relevant order directing that all persons operating in UK financial sector not able to enter or continue to participate in any transaction or business relationship with claimant bank - Claimant challenging order - Challenge being rejected - Whether order procedurally or substantively lawful - Financial Restrictions (Iran) Order 2009, SI 2009/272 - Sch 7.
Terrorism Prevention of terrorism. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the claimant's appeal against an unsuccessful challenge to the Financial Restrictions (Iran) Order 2009, , which directed that all persons operating in the United Kingdom financial sector could not enter into or continue to participate in any transaction or business relationship with the claimant bank and the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases