Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2010] All ER (D) 21 (Oct)
Neutral Citation: [2010] EWHC 1602 (Admin)
Court: Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (Manchester)

Langstaff J

Representation The claimant appeared in person.
  Tim Buley appeared on behalf of the defendant.
Judgment Dates: 26 May 2010


Town and country planning - Permission for development - Refusal - Defendant refusing permission to further develop site - Claimant appealing - Whether decision of defendant should be quashed

The Case

Town and country planning Permission for development. The Administrative Court held that there had been no obvious error of fact, let alone any material misapprehension of fact and the defendant had not erred in refusing planning permission.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.