|| All ER (D) 115 (May)
|| EWHC 1301 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court
Elias LJ and Keith J (Judgment delivered extempore)
||Malcolm Gibney (instructed by Sharon Taylor Associates, Poole) for the appellant.
||Ethu Crorie (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the respondent.
||13 May 2010
Game - Deer - Offence - Poaching of deer - Appellant arrested for killing fawn - No direct evidence against appellant - Evidence consisting of comments made by appellant to police and hidden footwear - Appelant pleading not guilty - Appellant convicted of killing fawn - Appellant appealing by way of case stated - Whether judge erring in ruling that there was a case to answer.
Game Deer. The Divisional Court dismissed the appellant's appeal by way of case stated, finding that the district judge had not erred in concluding that there had been evidence on which the judge could properly have concluded that the appellant was guilty of the offence with which he was prosecuted.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary