||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 235 (Jul)
||Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London)
David Elvin QC (judgment delivered extempore)
||Satvinder Juss (instructed by Riaz Khan & Co) for the claimant.
||Mungo Wembon-Smith (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
||22 July 2009
Immigration - Asylum seeker - Decision - Claimant arriving in United Kingdom and claiming asylum - Application being rejected by Secretary of State - Secretary of State rejecting further representations as not amounting to fresh claim - Whether Secretary of State erring - art 8
Immigration Asylum seeker. Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London): The claimant's application for judicial review on the basis that the Secretary of State's decision to reject his claim for asylum was irrational was dismissed on the basis that the claimant had put forward any fresh evidence in support of his claim.
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports