Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2009] All ER (D) 235 (Jul)
Court: Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London)
Judge:

David Elvin QC (judgment delivered extempore)

Representation Satvinder Juss (instructed by Riaz Khan & Co) for the claimant.
  Mungo Wembon-Smith (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
Judgment Dates: 22 July 2009

Catchwords

Immigration - Asylum seeker - Decision - Claimant arriving in United Kingdom and claiming asylum - Application being rejected by Secretary of State - Secretary of State rejecting further representations as not amounting to fresh claim - Whether Secretary of State erring - art 8

The Case

Immigration Asylum seeker. Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London): The claimant's application for judicial review on the basis that the Secretary of State's decision to reject his claim for asylum was irrational was dismissed on the basis that the claimant had put forward any fresh evidence in support of his claim.

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.