||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 171 (Jul)
|| EWHC 1751 (Comm)
||Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court
||Andrew Sutcliffe QC and Alexia Knight (instructed by Fulbright & Jaworski International LLP) for the claimant.
||Charles Hollander QC and David Scannell (instructed by Eversheds) for the defendant.
||16 July 2009
Contract - Construction - Contractual term - Claimant television production company entering into agreements from 1990 to 1999 with defendant television production and broadcasting company - Agreements providing sum to be paid to claimant if programme repeated - Defendant repeating programme on digital terrestrial television, ITV2 - Claimant seeking payment from defendant in respect of repeat programmes - Defendant contending that claimant only entitled to royalties since repeat fee only payable if programme repeated on ITV1 - Whether claimant entitled to repeat fees under the agreements.
Contract Construction. Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court: Where the parties had entered into three agreements regarding the transmission of television programmes on a terrestrial television, ITV, which provided for a fee to be paid to the claimant if the programme was to be repeated on that channel, the claimant was not entitled to a repeat fee since the repeat programmes had been transmitted on digital television channels ITV2 and ITV3 which had not been provided for in the agreement.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases