||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 134 (Jan)
|| EWHC 28 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court
||Edmund Lawson QC and Ben Cooper (instructed by Kaim Todner Solicitors) for the appellants.
||Helen Malcolm QC (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the respondents.
||20 January 2009
Extradition - Request for extradition - Bar to extradition - Circumstances rendering it unjust or oppressive to extradite - Passage of time since commission of alleged offence - Culpable delay - District judge ruling extradition not unjust or oppressive - Whether extradition unjust or oppressive by reason of passage of time to return - s 82.
Extradition Request for extradition. Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court: An appeal by the appellants against a decision of a judge to send the appellants' case to the Secretary of State for a decision whether they should be extradited was dismissed where the judge had been fully entitled to decide the issue of risk of prejudice in the conduct of the trial against them.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports