||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 57 (Jan)
|| EWHC 238 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court
Maurice Kay LJ and Wyn Williams J (judgment delivered extempore)
||Richard Bloomfield (instructed by Ben Hoare Bell) for the appellant.
||Robert Spragg (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the prosecution.
||14 January 2009
Criminal law - Trial - No case to answer - Appellant being tried with handling stolen goods at youth court - Trial commencing on papers - Justices rejecting submission of no case to answer - Justices convicting appellant of handing stolen goods - Whether justices entitled to find that there was a case to answer.
Criminal law Trial. Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court: An appeal by way of case stated against a decision of the justices that the appellant had been guilty of an offence of handling stolen goods contrary to of the Theft Act 1968 was dismissed.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports