||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 180 (Aug)
|| EWHC 2490 (QB)
||Queen's Bench Division
Slade J (judgment delivered extempore)
||Anthony Coleman (instructed by Henmans LLP, Oxford) for the claimant.
||Jacqueline Perry QC (instructed by Just Law, Chelmsford) for the defendant.
||21 August 2009
Damages - Personal injury - Provisional damages - Order for provisional damages - Chance of serious deterioration in claimant's physical condition - Claimant suffering serious ankle injury through defendant's negligence - Claimant said to require further surgery carrying risk of below-knee amputation - Experts disagreeing on likelihood of amputation being required - Claimant applying for provisional damages in event of suffering amputation - Whether claimant required to prove on balance of probabilities that he would definitely undergo operation - .
Damages Personal injury. Queen's Bench Division: The court made an order for provisional damages, where, on the facts of the case, it was appropriate to do so. The court reiterated that, pursuant to s32A of the the correct test to be applied when deciding whether it was appropriate to make such an award was whether there was a possibility, as a result of the act or omission giving rise to the cause of action and on the balance of probabilities, the claimant would undergo a serious deterioration in his physical condition in the future.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases