||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 293 (Jun)
||Employment Appeal Tribunal
Elias J, Mr D J Jenkins and Mrs J M Matthias
||The employee was represented by his solicitor.
||The employer appeared by its representative.
||5 June 2008
Employment - Discrimination - Victimisation - Remuneration - Deduction from wages - Employee being refused work as pizza delivery driver - Employee alleging victimisation by reason of race and age and unlawful deduction of wages - Employment tribunal accepting both allegations and making award of compensation - Whether evidence to support findings - s 2 - Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006, , reg 4.
In the instant case, the employment tribunal's decision to award compensation to the employee on the grounds that he had been victimised contrary to s2 of the and reg4 of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006, , and that there had been an unlawful deduction from his wages in respect of the period in which he had been refused work by his employer, had been based on the evidence. There was no reason at all to doubt any of the tribunal's findings. It had, in particular, been entitled to find that the insurance brokers' advice in respect of the status of the employee's insurance documentation was wrong.
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports